The Verizon vs. AT&T Network Showdown

On February 10, 2011, in Industry News, by Mac|Life Staff

Nic and Ray embarked on a sort of scientific head-to-head test of the Verizon and AT&T networks. They traveled to San Francisco’s finest landmarks to see which network would prevail in a voice and data battle to the death. How we conducted our test…

The Verizon vs. AT&T Network Showdown

On February 10, 2011, in Industry News, by Mac|Life Staff

Nic and Ray embarked on a sort of scientific head-to-head test of the Verizon and AT&T networks. They traveled to San Francisco’s finest landmarks to see which network would prevail in a voice and data battle to the death. How we conducted our test…

Video: iOS Device Speeds Put to the Test

On September 15, 2010, in Industry News, iPhone 3gs, iPod Touch, by Seamus Bellamy

There is a stumbling block that must be surmounted before we as a species can hope to tackle such dark issues as war, famine, and racisim. It is a topic of heated debate, being bickered out in multiple locales around the world as we speak. It is a subj…

Tagged with:  

Video: iOS 4.1 Improves iPhone 3G Speeds By Just a Bit

On September 7, 2010, in Industry News, iPhone 3g, by Cory Bohon

With the newly announced (but not yet released to the public) version of iOS, the iPhone 3G bugs have mostly been squashed. Apple made a point in saying that this forthcoming update (iOS 4.1) would alleviate some of the problems iPhone 3G owners had…

Tagged with:  

Parallels Comes Out On Top in Virtualization Speed Test

On February 10, 2010, in Industry News, by J.R. Bookwalter

Parallels vs. VMfusion speed tests
(Image courtesy of AppleInsider)

If you’re in need of virtualization software, speed will be at the top of your “must-have” list. Thanks to MacTech magazine, a clear winner has now been declared.

AppleInsider is reporting
that an “exhaustive series of tests” by MacTech magazine has declared Parallels Desktop 5.0 to be the clear winner in the speed race against VMware Fusion 3.0. The results show that Parallels is on average 30 percent faster than VMware, as outlined in an eight-page spread in the magazine. The main areas where Parallels is out in front include graphics, gaming
and 3D performance.

“If gaming, graphics, and 3D are your thing, you have no choice. Parallels Desktop has so much better graphics support, and is so much faster in most of the comparisons, there’s simply no contest,” writes MacTech.

But the magazine is quick to point out that speed alone shouldn’t necessarily dictate your choice of virtualization software.

“In the end, your decision as to which product you should take into account what’s most important to you: speed, footprint, graphics capabilities, features, user interface, OS you want to run, and more all come into play,” MacTech concludes.

Also of note is that MacTech still recommends Windows XP for virtualization, noting that it continues to outperform the more recent Windows Vista and Windows 7 from Microsoft.

Finally, MacTech advises that more RAM configured to a virtual machine is not always better — in fact, it leads to longer launch times, suspends and resumes. The magazine recommends 512MB and no more than 1GB of virtual machine RAM for most users.

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!